The title should tell the readers “This is what this figure is about” very clearly. How to write a good legend that makes a figure clear as day, all by itself, in a scientific paper? 1. Don’t tell your readers to “See Methods” - most of them won’t look through the maze of text to search for the exact spot where you buried this piece of information. Readers want to understand it without going back and forth between the figure and the text sections. Write it right: 3 notes about the content of a legendĪ figure should be able to stand alone. This post will give you a few tips to write and format figure legends for scientific papers. A good legend will make or break a graphic. That’s what the legend (a.k.a caption) is for. After making a good chart (or a figure of any kind), you will have to describe it. We’ve talked about good and bad charts before. They catch eyes, they deliver information effectively, they highlight your results. Writing a scientific paper? Preparing for publication? Making a poster for a conference tomorrow? Let’s face it: People will skim through the body text of your paper/poster, and only look at the figures.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |